|
Written by Josh O'Conner
|
|
Thursday, October 14 2010 15:15 |
|

I am a big fan of the hyper-local plan concept as I think that such a scale allows real community input and ensures a focus on more realistic outcomes. While overarching plans on a city or regional level are excellent guiding documents, they often fall short of getting any significant segment of the population excited about potential changes. Focusing plans on a neighborhood level allows residents to feel as if they have input in to the process and also provides a tangible scale for future efforts. Residents are able to look at specific places within their neighborhood and communicate how their vision of the future would maintain or change those places.
|
|
Last Updated on Thursday, October 14 2010 18:38 |
|
Burton Street Community Plan - Read More
|
|
|
Written by Josh O'Conner
|
|
Saturday, October 24 2009 16:40 |
|

Jane Jacobs is well known for her work in grass roots community activism and for taking her message to the streets. Mike Joyce of Stereotype Design has extended Jacob’s legacy of citizen activism through a unique brand of guerilla activism targeted toward some of the more infamous chain stores creeping up in Greenwich Village.
Mike’s work makes a statement about the proliferation of corporate chains into areas previously claimed by independent business owners. With the slogan “More Jane Jacobs, Less Marc Jacobs” Joyce helps communicate a message about the way that communities are developing as opposed to the way that residents desire them to develop. In an environment often dominated by the political, technical, and economic factors related to community development, it’s refreshing to see a campaign that pushes a social message in a manner that drives conversation.
In an interview with the Vanishing New York blog, Mike Joyce points out that the campaign isn’t intended as a direct attack toward Marc Jacobs, but is a statement in a broader context about the proliferation of chain stores.
You can check out more of Mike Joyce’s work at Stereotpe. You can order a shirt by
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
directly. |
|
Last Updated on Saturday, October 24 2009 17:01 |
|
Written by Josh O'Conner
|
|
Friday, October 16 2009 23:05 |
|

Community: The Structure of Belonging Peter Block
“The future is created one room at a time, one gathering at a time.”
In an effort to expand my own knowledge and to become better connected to the concepts that power the field of planning, I read a respectable amount of planning related literature. Most of the literature takes a concept, explains it, provides some examples of how that concept is being used in other places, and then provides a stepping off point for others interested in integrating that concept into the planning efforts within their own jurisdiction. Community is not that book. (More after the jump)
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, October 16 2009 23:35 |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Josh O'Conner
|
|
Wednesday, October 14 2009 01:17 |
|

Getting motivated to organize a neighborhood and to start building a better community through increased participation is the easy part. Actually organizing that neighborhood is an entirely different story. We often get inspired to mobilize people around an urgent problem or a single campaign, but what happens after that campaign is over? How can that momentum be maintained into the future of the community to better facilitate developing a collaborative vision of the future? (More after the jump)
|
|
Last Updated on Wednesday, October 14 2009 01:46 |
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Josh O'Conner
|
|
Thursday, October 08 2009 22:01 |
|

The term “smart growth” tends to be tossed around in politically loaded arguments relating to land use and transportation issues. Most often the term is used to refer to some manner of development that is the opposite of what is being done or proposed. Arguments about how a subdivision shouldn’t be plopped in an existing neighborhood; instead the land should be used in accordance with smart growth principles. Charges that a large wooded tract at the edge of an urban area isn’t a suitable site for a new shopping center, but that smart growth would allow retail development in a struggling downtown area. While these arguments are most certainly valid, it can be a struggle to see how smart growth is intended to work and what its guiding principles are. (More after the jump)
|
|
Last Updated on Thursday, October 08 2009 22:14 |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |